What type of jurisdiction exists when the federal government acquires some rights but does not gain state authority?

Proprietary jurisdiction occurs when the federal government has some rights over a particular area but does not assume full state authority. In this context, the federal government can manage and control the property for specific purposes, such as maintaining federal facilities, yet does not exercise the full range of regulatory or legislative powers that a state would typically possess. This distinction is crucial because it illustrates the limited scope of federal involvement, favoring state governance in most matters, except those specifically delegated or managed by federal authorities.

In proprietary jurisdiction, local laws and state authority still play a significant role, and the federal government operates under certain limitations, which differentiates it from other forms of jurisdiction, such as concurrent jurisdiction, where both the federal and state governments possess overlapping regulatory authority, or exclusive jurisdiction, where only the federal government has all powers in a given area. Understanding this terminology is vital for roles within the FPS, as it helps clarify the boundaries of authority in situations that may involve federal properties or institutions.